Texas Supreme Court Wants Standardized Divorce Forms

Read how the state of Texas is trying to change DYI divorce, taking what is usually a burdensome, confusing, costly and stressful process and simplifying it so that everyone can understand.

By  Josh D. Simon
Updated: February 26, 2015
 

April 4, 2012: Texas Supreme Court Wants Standardized Divorce Forms

According to an article from Austin's Statesmen.com, Texas' highest court and advocates representing low-income Texans are on a mission to standardize divorce forms, so that spouses who opt for the do-it-yourself ("pro se divorce") route for their uncontested divorce can turn an otherwise burdensome, confusing, costly and stressful process into one that makes more sense to everyone.

Related divorce resources:    

pic-couple.jpg (15063 bytes)

Texas Divorce Rates on a downward spiral

Divorce, the Texas Way

Texas divorce stars in Denison

 

Currently, Texas is one of only 13 states without standardized divorce forms. Spouses are obliged to buy forms from various 3rd parties, but the courts aren't obligated to accept them.

However, if the judiciary and advocates have their way, spouses will be able to download standardized divorce forms online at no cost. They'll only be required to pay a fee once the forms are approved by the courts.

"Texas lawyers give a lot of free legal assistance, and the federal government provides legal organizations to help," commented Harry Reasoner, head of the Texas Access to Justice Commission, an advocacy group created in 2001 by the Texas Supreme Court. "Even with all that, four-fifths of people that can't hire a lawyer are turned away because we don't have enough resources to help."

That's a view shared by Wallace Jefferson, chief justice of the Texas Supreme Court, who has written that standardized forms would "provide our poorest citizens access to the rule of law," and would "increase access to justice and reduce the strain on courts posed by pro se litigants."

However, not everyone in Texas is cheering on the proposed change.

Many of the state's family lawyers, and the state bar itself, have argued that standardized forms could do more harm than good for individuals and spouses who underestimate the complexity of their divorce - and end up making bad decisions that could haunt them financially and legally.

"At this time we do not believe drafting another set of forms will be helpful," commented Thomas Ausley, head of the family law council of the Texas state bar. "It's complicated, and [divorcing people] need help and advice in completing the process."

Ausley also quickly points out that the issue is not about family lawyers potentially losing business to clients who opt for the DIY route thanks to new standardized forms.

"Money is not an issue for the family law section because almost all the lawyers [provide help to low income clients] for free, anyway," commented Ausley. "Standardized divorce forms won't cost me personally or my law firm anything. It's not applicable here at all."

The contentious - and game changing - issue is on the agenda for an April 13 meeting of the Texas Supreme Court Advisory Committee, which will pass on their final "yes or no" recommendation to the Texas Supreme Court.


For frequently asked questions on Texas divorce, click here.
For divorce professional in Texas, click here.

Back To Top

April 10, 2012
Categories:  General

Add A Comment

Comment

Allowed HTML: <b>, <i>, <u>, <a>

Comments

DIVORCE PROFESSIONALS

Divorce Lawyers

Certified Divorce Financial Analyst

Find all CDFAs

Divorce Mediators

Find Divorce Mediators

Business Valuators / CPAs

Find Business Valuators / CPAs

Collaborative Practice

Find Collaborative Practitioners


Reason for your Divorce

Why did your relationship end? If there's more than one reason, choose the strongest factor.

Money Problems/Arguments
Physical/Emotional Infidelity
Physical/Mental Illness
Physical/Emotional Abuse
Alcoholism/Addiction Issues
Basic Incompatibility


Copyright © 2017 Divorce Magazine, Divorce Marketing Group & Segue Esprit Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without prior written permission is prohibited.