For the past two years, the Florida legislation has failed to pass alimony reform. In 2014 Governor Scott vetoed the legislation hours before it was to become law. In 2015 the legislation failed as the House and Senate could not agree on the appropriate version of the bill. So nothing has been done to date.
There is a strong argument for alimony reform due to disparate results caused by the amount of discretion provided to the Court.
Many argue that this could be resolved by the implementation of reasonable guidelines similar to the way child support is determined.
It appears the alimony reform bill failed this time because of a disagreement about whether equal time sharing between divorcing parents and their children are preemptively in the children’s best interests. Arguments against the 50/50 presumption arise from the view point that each time sharing case should be tailored to what is in the child’s best interest, as opposed to presuming one time sharing is better than another as a starting point. Currently there is no presumption as to what percentage of time sharing should be a starting point.
The previously proposed legislation for the past two years had a retroactive application. This meant that parents who entered into an agreement a year ago could use the new law to renegotiate the rights that had just been resolved. Imagine making significant compromises to resolve a divorce and finalize it, only to have to defend litigation the following year trying to void the deal because of this retroactive application.
While the latest version of the alimony reform bill did not have a retroactive clause, it could still be applied to cases that have been decided by a judge or settled by parties in the past – it just could not be the sole reason for a modification.
It seems that alimony reform is on the horizon, and while the bills have not been able to pass in the past few years, the momentum keeps growing. All signs seem to indicate that these bills are not going away, and some alimony reform may make its way through.