Divorce Professionals | Divorce Articles | Divorce FAQs | Online Forum | Divorce Resources | Advertise

Divorce Polls  |  Magazine Subscription  |  Free eNewsletter  |  Web Links  |  Dating  Contact
Find a Professional
Find a divorce lawyer, mediator, accountant, Certified Divorce Financial Analyst, therapist and more...
Click Here to Advertise With Us

online divorce: complete case
Get Divorce Magazine
Divorce Quick Poll: vote here!
Vital information about separation & divorce
send this page!
Free Divorce Magazine Newsletter!

This site sponsored by:
California Family Law Attorneys Finanical Solution for Women San Diego Mediation Center - Julia Garwood
Divorce Law and Court Case News
 < previous page

March 6, 2009: California divorce case may change rules on financial discovery

by Jeffrey Cottrill

CALIFORNIA -- A 2007 appellate divorce case has brought recent light to the subject of full financial disclosure in California divorces.

In In re Marriage of Feldman, a businessman did not disclose certain assets and financial transactions to his wife, although she repeatedly requested the information. Among the information Feldman wouldn't reveal was the formation of several new companies. Mrs. Feldman had learned about her husband's undisclosed assets before the divorce trial and provided her own investigation into the discovery.

Feldman claimed that his lack of disclosure was not intentional and that the secret assets were of small value compared to the whole of the estate. However, the California Court of Appeals rejected these arguments, stating that a divorcing spouse has a duty to disclose everything, which is mandatory until all assets are divided, and that such refusal to do so is not acceptable. According to the Court, Feldman was obliged to disclose all material information in writing, continue to supplement the discovery, and disclose material info before any new project began.

More stories on property division:
Looking for Hidden Assets
Dividing Marital Property

When Property Disputes Go Wrong
Who Gets What?
Yours, Mine, and Ours

In the end, even though the hidden assets and transactions had not economically damaged Mrs. Feldman in any way, the trial court decided that Feldman should pay his wife $250,000 in sanctions for his failure to comply with the requested disclosure -- as well as another $140,000 in her attorney fees. The court ordered the sanctions under the sections of the Family Law Code related to fiduciary duty.

The moral seems to be that hiding important financial information from your spouse is never a good idea. The consequences of doing so, such as the results of the Feldman case, could be far more costly than simply agreeing to a fair property division.

More divorce law and court case news: http://www.divorcemag.com/articles/Divorce-Law-and-Court-Cases

More articles     Find a lawyer    Divorce FAQs     Divorce newsletter



More articles        Find a lawyer        Divorce FAQs        Divorce newsletter

Advertise on DivorceMag.com

Advertising for, Lawyers, Family lawyer, Family Law Attorney, Divorce lawyer, Divorce attorney, Accountants

Divorce Magazine's Advisory Board