Divorce Professionals | Divorce Articles | Divorce FAQs | Online Forum | Divorce Resources | Advertise

Divorce Polls  |  Blogs  |  Magazine Subscription  |  Free eNewsletter  |  Web Links  |  Contact
Find a Professional
Find a divorce lawyer, mediator, accountant, Certified Divorce Financial Analyst, therapist and more...
To advertise with us call our toll free number 877-493-1650 or Click Here

Share

Get Divorce Magazine
vote here
Vital information about separation & divorce
send this page

This site sponsored by:
MacDonald & Partners Nathens, Siegel: Toronto Divorce Lawyers Toronto family lawyers, Lorne Fine

FAQs Written by Professionals in Ontario

< previous page
SECTIONNote that answers given in this section cannot take the place of independant legal or financial advise. Please read our disclaimer.

"Is joint custody granted only in amicable divorce cases? My ex spouse and I are far from friendly, but there’s no way I want to lose access to my kids."

Custody disputes are perhaps the most difficult aspect of family law.  Fuelled by emotion, these disputes tend to drain the participants both emotionally and financially. Attentive to the sensitive nature of these disputes, our courts have attempted to carve out new and innovative ways to diffuse high conflict cases, resulting in several developments in custody law since the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Kaplanis v. Kaplanis. In Kaplanis, the Court of Appeal made clear that joint custody should not be awarded in high conflict situations. The Court held that joint custody or parallel parenting should only be ordered where parents can communicate effectively. There must be some evidence before the court that, despite their differences, the parents are able to communicate effectively with one another. In the absence of evidence of co-parenting, one parent will be awarded sole custody.

Notwithstanding the Court of Appeal decision in Kaplanis, recent case law suggests that joint custody, together with a parallel parenting model, may be a viable option in high conflict cases. The Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Ursic v. Ursic together with subsequent cases, revive the notion of parallel parenting in high conflict cases. Courts are increasingly recognizing that it is not in the best interests of children to simply give one parent final say over all decisions relating to the children, especially if there is potential for that parent to abuse that power in an effort to damage the other parent's relationship with the child or children. Where both parents are capable and want to play an active role in their children's lives, joint custody together with a detailed parallel parenting regime is a viable option notwithstanding the parties' conflict and inability to communicate. To answer your question, more and more courts today are distinguishing Kaplanis and not simply ordering sole custody in high-conflict cases, opting instead to provide parents with tools that will allow them to parent in the best interests of their children, while at the same time reducing conflict.


Gary Joseph and Michael Stangarone are lawyers with Toronto's MacDonald & Partners family-law firm. They can be reached at (416) 971-4802. View their firm's Divorce Magazine profile.


Celebrity Divorce
Kenny G, Smooth Musician Having Rocky Divorce
A Brand New Market: Katy Perry and Russell Brand Go Solo
Seattle Mariners' Chris Larson and Wife Julia Calhoun

More Celebrity News

Follow us on twitter Follow us on facebook Follow us on LnkedIN Follow us on our blog

FREE Divorce Teleseminars
To Educate and Empower
Divorce People

Tuesday, February 14
at 8 pm to 8:30 EST
Preparing for Divorce Mediation - 5 Steps of Negotiation Power to get what you want
Learn More

Listen to podcasts of previous TeleSeminars.