Divorce Professionals | Divorce Articles | Divorce FAQs | Online Forum | Divorce Resources | Advertise

Divorce Polls  |  Blogs  |  Magazine Subscription  |  Free eNewsletter  |  Web Links  |  Contact
Find a Professional
Find a divorce lawyer, mediator, accountant, Certified Divorce Financial Analyst, therapist and more...
To advertise with us call our toll free number 877-493-1650 or Click Here

Share

New Jersey Family Lawyers
Get Divorce Magazine
Vital information about separation & divorce

This site sponsored by:
Sussex/Morris/Warren County Divorce Lawyers: Gruber, Colabella, Liuzza & Williams 5 Critical Risks of Divorce, Watch Free Seminar

SECTIONNote that answers given in this section cannot take the place of a lawyer. For legal advice about your specific situation, you must consult a qualified lawyer. See our disclaimer.

"Can a New Jersey court make a parent carry life insurance for the benefit of a child?"

The answer is "yes." A New Jersey court can compel a parent to carry life insurance for the benefit of a child, even though the parent never carried life insurance before. However, the determination is obviously fact sensitive and must take into consideration the financial circumstances of the parties.

The obligation to support a child is more multi-faceted then just a paying a set sum each week. Included in the obligations of a parent are the obligation to provide health care insurance; the obligation to provide for a child’s education; and the obligation to protect the child’s source of support in the event of the death of a parent. This latter protection is most often provided through the vehicle of life insurance.

Furthermore, New Jersey has a specific statute that compels a parent, once a divorce, nullity, or separate maintenance action has been filed, to maintain life insurance coverage, pending the outcome of the action. Of course, either party may apply to the court to have the financial burden shared, or shifted to the other party.

The question of whether a wife can compel her ex-husband to name her as the beneficiary of the policy is more problematic. A court will often order that the wife be named as a beneficiary in her capacity as trustee for the children as opposed to being a beneficiary in her own right. Furthermore, in many cases the court will order that another person, such as an individual trustee or a bank, be named as a beneficiary.


Joseph Weinberg is a senior partner of the Haddonfield, NJ-based firm of Weinberg, McCormick, Chatzinoff & Zoll. He has practiced family law in New Jersey for more than 35 years and has received numerous honors for his dedicated commitment to the practice of family law; Weinberg was recently recognized as one of the “Ten Leaders of Matrimonial and Divorce Law of Southern New Jersey.

Celebrity Divorce
Ruben Studdard's Prenup Holds Up in Court
Alec Baldwin Getting Married Again
Heidi Klum Opens Up on Her Split from Seal

More Celebrity News

Follow us on twitter Follow us on facebook Follow us on LnkedIN Follow us on our blog

FREE Divorce Teleseminars
To Educate and Empower
Divorce People

Tuesday, May 15
at 8 pm to 8:30 EST
Out With the Tragedy: Turning Divorce into a meaningful experience
with Allison Pescosolido and Andra Brosh, founders of Divorce Detox
Learn More

Listen to podcasts of previous TeleSeminars.

 
   
Join our online poll
If you RECEIVE spousal support, do you think the amount is:

Click here to vote.
Free Marketing Teleseminars
for Divorce Lawyers

Thursday, March 22
2 p.m., ET
SEO - What, How
and Why

No Cost. No Sales Pitch.
No Pre-Registration.


Learn more.